ISEC 2000 logo


Presented at ISEC 2000

The study of psycho - educational Variables affect educational achievement of included hearing impaired students in Iran -2001

N. Akbarloo & M. Ghadami

In the name of God

In each country, the education of children with disabilities is one of the indicators of development and its educational situation. Inclusive education is a step to wards creating equal opportunities . We would like to present a summary of ordinary education and special education with emphasize on students with hearing impairment .

INTRODUCTION

There is no evident document concerning the begining of informal special education in Iran. But some steps have been taken in the field of educating children with disabilities specially blind and deaf children. The most important criteria are as follow :

Criteria Year
First school established 1849
Ministry of Education established 1853
Informal education of children with disabilities before 1925
Formal education of children with disabilities 1925
Special children office established 1968
Special Education Organization established 1992

Table 1: Criteria of education in Iran. .

Now there are more than 17/000/000 Students at diffrent levels in Iran who are detailed as :

Level Number
Primary 8/287/537
Lower secondary (Guiding) 5/172/512
Upper secondary (High school) 4/008/760
Pre - university 396/018
Total 17/864/831

Table 2: Distribution of students.

Also 251/556 Children Covered by preschool education . History of special education is tied to the name of Jabbar Baghchehban (the first teacher of deaf students) in 1925 . during last decades, the situation of special education in Iran has been improved due to: 1) appropriate curriculum, 2) allocation more funds, 3) proper legislation .

Impairment Number of studentsin special schools Number of studentsin ordinary schools Row total
Hearing 16406 1227 17632
Visual 2334 1281 3615
Mental retardation 46245 13869 60114
SeriousEmotional disturbance 250 Unknown 250
Orthopedic 910 280 1190
Multi - Handicapped 3021 Unknown 3021
Specific Learning disability 0 6868 6868
Sum total 69165 23525 92691

Table 3: Distribution of students in special and ordinary schools .

Hearing impaired students distribution with regard to educational level in special and ordinary schools are as follow :

Level Special school Integrated Row total
Preschool 2611 0 2611
Primary 820 438 8639
Lower secondary 3281 394 3508
Upper secondary 2311 396 2709
Sum total 16406 1227 17633

Table 4: Distribution of hearing impairedstudents.

This study has been done on 556 integrated students with the following characters: The Age range 6 - 21 The average age of hearing loss 2 - 5 years (SD= 0/57 years) . The average age of diagnosis 2 - 5 years (SD= 0/862 years) . The average age of amplification 2 - 5 years (SD= 1) The average age of integration 11/32 years (SD= 4/75 years) . The average duration of integration 3/22 years (SD= 2/64 years) .

Level Number
Primary 182
Lower secondary 195
Upper secondary 179
Total 556

Table 5: Distribution of studied cases .

1: Independent variables Age of hearing loss and diagnosis

Age of intervention (Pre - school education).
Degree of hearing loss.
Type and use of sensory aid.
Age and duration of inclusion .

2: Dependent variables (as the indicators of educational success) .

Average of final annual score .
Fail in a grade or lesson .
Class teacher's Idea about students' progress .
Itinerant teacher's idea about students' progress .

DATA ANALYSIS

EffectiveVariables based on predictability R.Square Degree of freedom P.Value
Age of integration 0/106 1 < 0/05
Duration of intervention 0/182 2 < 0/05
Preschool education 0/239 3 < 0/05
Degree of hearing loss 0/051 4 < 0/05

Table 6: Multiple Regression of average scores and independent variables .

Effective variables based onPredictability R.Square Degree Of Freedom P.Value
Age of Diagnosis 0/103 1 < 0/05
Duration of integration 0/215 3 < 0/05
Age of integration 0/311 4 < 0/05

Table 7: Multiple regression of fail in a grade or a lesson and independent variables .

Effective variables base onPredictability R.Square Degree Of Freedom P.Value
Age of Amplification 0/512 1 <0/05
Duration of integration 0/097 2 < 0/05

Table 8: Multiple regression of itinerant teacher's idea and independent variables .

Variable I Variable II CorrelationCoefficient
Age of diagnosis Duration of integration 0/237
Age of diagnosis Fail 0/321
Age of diagnosis Age of integration -0/446
Pre school education Duration of integration 0/324
Pre school education Fail - 0/19
Degree of hearing loss Age of integration 0/355
Degree of hearing loss Communication mode 0/251
Degree of hearing loss Duration of integration -0/272
Degree of hearing loss Duration of integration 0/262
Age of hearing loss Age of integration 0/245
Use time of amplification Fail 0/227
Use time of amplification Degree of hearing less - 0/224
Type of Amplification Use of amplification 0/304
Age of integration Fail 0/144
Age of integration Communication mode 0/216
Duration of integration Fail 0/281

Table 9: Correlation of variables.

Results

The results of multiple regression of average score of students and independent variables testing are shown in table 6. The results of multiple regression of fail in a grade or a lesson testing are shown in table 7. The results of multiple regression of average score of itinerant teachers idea about students educational situation and independent variables are shown in table 8 .

The common variables in three tests which affect the success of hearing impaired students are :

1- Age of diagnosis .
2- Age of integration .
3- Duration of integration .
4- Preschool education .
5- Degree of hearing loss.
6- Age of amplification .

The test of correlation between variables is shown in table 4 . There is correlation between expected variables such as age of diagnosis and integration and age of amplification and fail in a degree or lesson and etc .

Conclusion

The most important factor in the education of deaf students is the early diagnosis of hearing lass and logically lesser age of intervention and amplification and cosequently better communication skills and speech perception and educational success in regacar clusses. Other results indicates the impurtance of hearing aid oriontalion specially in the early childhood and consistenly of its use .

Index

 

to ISEC home page

to Inclusive Technology website inclusiveTLC.com