ISEC 2000 logo


Presented at ISEC 2000

Specific Developmental Dyslexia

Peter Pumfrey - National Association for Special Educational Needs, UK

Abstract:

Introduction
The nature, identification, incidence, prognosis and alleviation of dyslexia presents professionals, parents and pupils with complex and continuing challenges (Klein and McMullen, 1999). In a society in which the importance of mastering language and literacy skills is highly valued, to be dyslexic is to be culturally and economically raille ized (Smythe, 2000).

This symposium looks at dyslexia at three stages of education. The first paper considers the use of diagnostic assessment techniques based on computerised tests designed to identify individual pupils' information processing strengths and weaknesses in the early years of primary education. From a psychoneurological viewpoint, the second presentation addresses the search for methods holding promise for junior school pupils with particular sub-types of dyslexia taught in withdrawal situations. The final paper discusses ways of helping dyslexic student in Higher Education through the use of voice recognition software.

The continuing existence of dyslexic difficulties at all three stages of education considered by the symposiasts underlines three key points. Firstly, dyslexia is a variable syndrome for which it is exceedingly unlikely that a panacea can ever be found. Secondly, advances in our understanding of the development of cognitive processes and in pedagogy, including applications of information and communications technology (ICT), hold considerable promise(Miles, 1999). Thirdly, the field is one in which many disciplines are legitimately involved.

References
Miles, T.R. and Miles, E. (1999) Dyslexia. A Hundred Years On. Buckingham: Open University Press (2nd. Edition). Smythe, I. (Ed.)(2000) The Dyslexia Handbook 2000. Reading: The British Dyslexia Association. Klein, R.M. and McMullen, P. (Eds.)(1999) Converging Methods for Understanding Reading and Dyslexia. Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.


Early Identification of Special Literacy Needs Using Computerised Cognitive Profiling

Chris. Singleton - Hull, England

This paper will describe the development of CoPS Cognitive Profiling battery of tests, and its use as a screening system for the early identification of children at risk of literacy difficulties. CoPS is a computerised assessment system that comprises 9 different tests of basic cognitive abilities, including phonological awareness, auditory discrimination, visual memory and auditory-verbal memory. The tests in CoPS were selected from 27 different tests that were developed and validated through a longitudinal study of 421 children, from age 5 through 8 years. Correlations between the computer tests administered at age 5 and reading ability at age 8 ranged from 0.39 to 0.56. Phonic skills at age 8 also correlated significantly with some of the computer measures (maximum r = 0.73 for auditory discrimination) Those tests which gave the most satisfactory statistical prediction of later reading and spelling skills were retained in the final CoPS battery of tests.

Stepwise multiple regression analyses confirmed the relative importance of the CoPS test of phonological awareness and auditory-verbal memory taken at age 5 as, in combination, a superior predictor of reading ability at age 8 than verbal intelligence. Discriminant function analyses were used to determine the false negative and false positive identification rates of prediction of later success or failure in reading at age 8 from the CoPS test scores. These finding will be discussed in relation to (a) the early identification of special needs / literacy and (b) the potential of computer-based cognitive profiling for facilitating differentiated teaching in special education.

Reference
Singleton, C., Thomas, K. and Horne, J. (in press) Computer-based cognitive assessment and the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, (2) June 2000.


Short-term Withdrawal Intervention for Dyslexic Pupils May Be Justified by Wider Curriculum Access in the Longer Term

Voice Recognition Software and Dyslexia

Peter J. Hill and Hilary Burns - Worcester England

Context
The value of Information Technology (IT) as a tool for supporting the studies of undergraduates affected by dyslexia is widely acknowledged (National Working Party on Dyslexia in Higher Education, 1999). One recent innovation, Voice Recognition (VR) software is attracting considerable attention. University College Worcester has been conducting research into the effectiveness of VR as an aid to study. This paper presents an overview of the ongoing UCW project.

Aims

  1. To identify and describe study skill and affective benefits to dyslexic students using the VR software.
  2. To identify good practice in respect of VR training and use.
  3. To inform the development of institutional policy in respect of VR with dyslexic student, including its use in examinations.

Method
The study is qualitative. It is an ethnographic action-research based on a quasi-emancipatory paradigm. Data are drawn from case-studies and descriptive statistics.

Population and Sample
The population is undergraduate students with dyslexia at UCW in receipt of Disabled Students Awards during the academic year 1999-2000 (N = 56). The sample is a convenience one drawn from the defined population (N = 6).

Results
Initial descriptive statistics based on case-study evidence suggest that VR software has the potential to be of considerable benefit to students in developing autonomy, facilitating more effective study skills, and encouraging affective development.

Conclusions

The rapid development, ease of use, and increasing popularity of the software mean that higher education institutions will soon need to revise their practices in respect of support for dyslexic students in both their studies and their examinations.

References
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE)(1998) The Learning Age and Higher Education in the 21st. Century. Response to the Dearing Report. London: Department for Education and Employment. National Working Party on Dyslexia in Higher Education (NWPDHE)(1999) Dyslexia in Higher Education: policy, provision and practice. Chair: C. Singleton, Department of Psychology, University of Hull. Hull: University of Hull.

 

Index

 

to ISEC home page

to Inclusive Technology website inclusiveTLC.com